Homo bodoensis

Homo bodoensis is the species name for extinct archaic humans that lived during the Chibanian (770–126 ka) in Africa. It relies on the fossil specimen known as Bodo cranium, which was discovered in 1976 in a dried up branch of the Awash River in Ethiopia and is estimated to have lived around 500,000 years ago. Following the comparative analysis of the fossil with those of other Homo falling on the same geological age, the name was formally introduced in 2021.[1]

Homo bodoensis
Temporal range: Middle Pleistocene
Bodo cranium, the type specimen
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Suborder: Haplorhini
Infraorder: Simiiformes
Family: Hominidae
Subfamily: Homininae
Tribe: Hominini
Genus: Homo
Species:
H. bodoensis
Binomial name
Homo bodoensis
Roksandic, Radović, Wu & Bae, 2021

Based on the confusing usage of scientific names for different hominin specimens of the Chibanian, a research team led by Mirjana Roksandic at the University of Winnipeg, Canada, proposed in Evolutionary Anthropology that H. bodoensis should be used as an umbrella name for all species of the same age in Africa, including H. rhodesiensis and H. heidelbergensis.[2] But not all scientists agree. British paleoanthropologist Chris Stringer argued that the name cannot replace H. rhodesiensis to which Bodo cranium is assigned since H. rhodesiensis (described by Arthur Smith Woodward in 1921) had been formally accepted.[3]

Naming

The name of the genus Homo is derived from Latin: homo, for human. The specific epithet bodoensis refers to the site Bodo D'ar in the Afar Depression (Ethiopia), where the type specimen Bodo cranium (Bodo 1) was discovered in 1976. Homo bodoensis therefore means "human from Bodo".[1]

Bodo cranium

The Bodo cranium[4] is a fossil of an extinct type of hominin species. It was found by members of an expedition led by Jon Kalb in 1976.[5] The Rift Valley Research Mission conducted a number of surveys that led to the findings of Acheulean tools and animal fossils, as well as the Bodo Cranium.[6] The initial discovery was by Alemayhew Asfaw and Charles Smart, who found a lower face. Two weeks later, Paul Whitehead and Craig Wood found the upper portion of the face. Pieces of the cranium were discovered along the surface of one of the dry branches of the Awash River in Ethiopia.[4] The cranium, artifacts, and other animal fossils were found over a relatively large area of medium sand, and only a few of the tools were found near the cranium.[7][8] The skull is 600,000 years old[9] and is now the type specimen of Homo bodoensis.[10] (formerly Homo heidelbergensis / Homo rhodesiensis).[11]

Observation

This specimen has an unusually large cranial capacity for its age that is estimated at around 1250 cc (in the range between ~1,200–1,325 cc) within the (lower) range of modern Homo sapiens.[12] The cranium includes the face, much of the frontal bone, parts of the midvault and the base anterior to the foramen magnum. The cranial length, width and height are 21 cm (8.3 in), 15.87 cm (6.2 in) and 19.05 cm (7.5 in) respectively. Researchers have suggested that Bodo butchered animals because Acheulean hand axes and cleavers, along with animal bones, were found at the site. Cuts on the Bodo cranium show the earliest evidence of removal of flesh immediately after the death of an individual using a stone tool.[7] The findings of symmetrical cut marks with specific patterns and directionality on the cranium serve as strong evidence that de-fleshing was done purposefully for mortuary practices and represents the earliest evidence of non-utilitarian mortuary practices.[7][13] The cut marks were located "laterally among the maxilla" causing speculation among researchers that the specific reason for de-fleshing was to remove the mandible.[14]

Morphology

The front of the Bodo cranium is very broad and supports large supraorbital structures. The supraorbital torus projects and is heavily constructed, especially in the central parts of the cranium. The Glabella is rounded and projects strongly. Like Homo erectus, the braincase is low and archaic in appearance. The vault bones are also thick like Homo erectus specimens. Due to the large cranial capacity, there is a wider midvault which includes signs of parietal bossing as well as a high contour of the temporal squama. The parietal length can’t be accurately determined because that section of the specimen is incomplete. Though the mastoid is missing, insights regarding the specimen can be determined using fragments from the individual collected at the scene in 1981. The cranium’s parietal walls expand relative to the bitemporal width in a way that is characteristic of modern humans. The squamosal suture has a high arch which is present in modern human craniums as well.[15]

Evolutionary Significance

The cranium has an unusual appearance, which has led to debates over its taxonomy. It displays both primitive and derived features, such as a cranial capacity more similar to modern humans and a projecting supraorbital torus more like Homo erectus.[4][16][17] Bodo and other Mid-Pleistocene hominin fossils appear to represent a lineage between Homo erectus and anatomically modern humans, although its exact location in the human evolutionary tree is still uncertain.[18][19] Due to the similarities to both Homo erectus and modern humans, it has been postulated that the Bodo cranium, as well as other members of Homo heidelbergensis were part of a group of hominins that evolved distinct from Homo erectus early in the Middle Pleistocene. Despite the similarities, there is still a question of where exactly Homo heidelbergensis evolved. The increased encephalization seen in fossils like the Bodo cranium is thought to have been a driving force in the speciation of anatomically modern humans.[20][21]

Similarities Between Bodo Cranium and Kabwe Cranium

Both the Bodo cranium and the Kabwe cranium share a number of similarities. Both have cranial capacities similar to, but on the low end of the range of modern humans(1250cc vs 1230cc). Both craniums have a very large supraorbital torus. These two features together suggest that they are a link between Homo erectus and Homo sapiens.[22] While there has been a recent push to update the Bodo Cranium classification to Homo bodoensis, it is clear that the morphology and the taxonomy are most similar to other specimens of type Homo heidelbergensis.[23] Both the Bodo and Kabwe specimens can be described as archaic because they retain certain features in common with Homo erectus. However, both exhibit important differences from Homo erectus in their anatomy, such as the contour of their parietals, the shape of their temporal bones, the cranial base, and the morphology of their nose and palate. While there are many similarities, there are a few differences between the specimens, including the entire brow of the Bodo cranium, particularly the lateral segments, which are less thick than the Kabwe specimen.[15]

Criticism

Immediately after the publication of the species name, the British paleoanthropologist Chris Stringer - a specialist in the relationships between Neanderthals and Homo sapiens - criticized the proposed departure from Homo heidelbergensis and the introduction of a new species name in New Scientist.[3] He does agree with the objection that too many and too different fossils of Homo heidelbergensis have been made; it is appropriate to assign only those European finds to Homo heidelbergensis that have a clear similarity to the lower jaw of Mauer, for example the lower jaw of Mala Balanica, but not fossils from Africa. According to the requirements of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, a species name that has already been introduced always has priority over a later one. Therefore, the designation Homo rhodesiensis takes precedence over Homo bodoensis. In this context, Stringer rejected the claim that the species name rhodesiensis honored Cecil Rhodes. In fact, it is a reference to the site in what was then Northern Rhodesia. But even if one wanted to avoid the reference to Rhodesia, the name Homo saldanensis[24] chosen for the skull roof Saldanha 1 in 1955 would have priority over Homo bodoensis. Finally, Stringer also pointed out that the face of the Bodo skull had features that speak for its own evolutionary path and make it appear doubtful that it was a direct ancestor of Homo sapiens.[25]

See also

References

  1. Roksandic, Mirjana; Radović, Predrag; Wu, Xiu‐Jie; Bae, Christopher J. (28 October 2021). "Resolving the "muddle in the middle": The case for Homo bodoensis sp. nov". Evolutionary Anthropology: 20–29. doi:10.1002/EVAN.21929. ISSN 1060-1538. Wikidata Q109321060.
  2. Badshah, Nadeem (28 October 2021). "Human species who lived 500,000 years ago named as Homo bodoensis". The Guardian. Retrieved 14 November 2021.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  3. Marshall, Michael (28 October 2021). "New human species has been named Homo bodoensis - but it may not stick". New Scientist. Retrieved 28 October 2021.
  4. Rightmire, Philip G. (1 July 1996). "The human cranium from Bodo, Ethiopia: evidence for speciation in the Middle Pleistocene?". Journal of Human Evolution. 31 (1): 21–39. doi:10.1006/jhev.1996.0046. ISSN 0047-2484.
  5. "Bodo Skull and Jaw". Skulls Unlimited. Archived from the original on 8 December 2015. Retrieved 15 October 2012.
  6. Conroy, Glenn C.; Weber, Gerhard W.; Seidler, Horst; Recheis, Wolfgang; Zur Nedden, Dieter; Haile Mariam, Jara (2000). "UC Berkeley Library Proxy Login". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 113 (1): 111–118. doi:10.1002/1096-8644(200009)113:1<111::aid-ajpa10>3.0.co;2-x. PMID 10954624.
  7. White, Tim D. (April 1986). "Cut marks on the Bodo cranium: A case of prehistoric defleshing". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 69 (4): 503–509. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330690410. ISSN 0002-9483. PMID 3087212.
  8. Kalb, Jon E.; Wood, Craig B.; Smart, Charles; Oswald, Elizabeth B.; Mabrete, Assefa; Tebedge, Sleshi; Whitehead, Paul (1 January 1980). "Preliminary geology and palaeontology of the Bodo D'ar hominid Site, Afar, Ethiopia". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 30: 107–120. Bibcode:1980PPP....30..107K. doi:10.1016/0031-0182(80)90052-8. ISSN 0031-0182.
  9. "Bodo". Humanorigins.si.edu. Retrieved 15 October 2012.
  10. Roksandic, Mirjana and Radović, Predrag and Wu, Xiu-Jie and Bae, Christopher J. (2021). "Resolving the "muddle in the middle": The case for Homo bodoensis sp. nov". Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. 31 (1): 20–29. doi:10.1002/evan.21929. PMC 9297855. PMID 34710249. S2CID 240152672.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. "Bodo fossil". Britannica Encyclopedia. Retrieved 15 October 2012.
  12. Milner, Richard. "Cranial Capacity." The Encyclopedia of Evolution: Humanity's Search For Its Origins. New York: Holt, 1990: 98. "Living humans have a cranial capacity ranging from about 950 cc to 1800 cc, with the average about 1400 cc."
  13. Tarlow, Sarah; Stutz, Liv Nilsson (2013). The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0199569069.
  14. Pickering, Travis Rayne; White, Tim D.; Toth, Nicholas (2000). "Brief communication: Cutmarks on a Plio-Pleistocene hominid from Sterkfontein, South Africa". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 111 (4): 579–584. doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(200004)111:4<579::aid-ajpa12>3.0.co;2-y. ISSN 1096-8644. PMID 10727975.
  15. Rightmire, Philip G. (July 1996). "The human cranium from Bodo, Ethiopia: evidence for speciation in the Middle Pleistocene?". Journal of Human Evolution. 31 (1): 21–39. doi:10.1006/jhev.1996.0046. ISSN 0047-2484.
  16. Rightmire, G. Philip (1 January 2001). "Patterns of hominid evolution and dispersal in the Middle Pleistocene". Quaternary International. 75 (1): 77–84. Bibcode:2001QuInt..75...77R. doi:10.1016/S1040-6182(00)00079-3. ISSN 1040-6182.
  17. Bräuer, Günter (2008). "The origin of modern anatomy: By speciation or intraspecific evolution?". Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. 17 (1): 22–37. doi:10.1002/evan.20157. ISSN 1520-6505. S2CID 53328127.
  18. Rightmire, G. Philip (1 September 2013). "Homo erectus and Middle Pleistocene hominins: Brain size, skull form, and species recognition". Journal of Human Evolution. 65 (3): 223–252. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.04.008. ISSN 0047-2484. PMID 23850294.
  19. Krovitz, Gail; McBratney, Brandeis M.; Lieberman, Daniel E. (5 February 2002). "The evolution and development of cranial form in Homo sapiens". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 99 (3): 1134–1139. Bibcode:2002PNAS...99.1134L. doi:10.1073/pnas.022440799. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 122156. PMID 11805284.
  20. Rightmire, G. Philip (January 2012). "The evolution of cranial form in mid-Pleistocene Homo". South African Journal of Science. 108 (3–4): 68–77. doi:10.4102/sajs.v108i3/4.719. ISSN 0038-2353.
  21. Conroy, Glenn C.; Weber, Gerhard W.; Seidler, Horst; Recheis, Wolfgang; Nedden, Dieter Zur; Mariam, Jara Haile (2000). "Endocranial capacity of the Bodo cranium determined from three-dimensional computed tomography". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 113 (1): 111–118. doi:10.1002/1096-8644(200009)113:1<111::aid-ajpa10>3.0.co;2-x. ISSN 1096-8644. PMID 10954624.
  22. Balzeau, A.; Buck, Laura; Albessard, L.; Becam, G.; Grimmaud-Herve, D.; Rae, T. C.; Stringer, C. B. (8 December 2017). "The internal cranial anatomy of the Middle Pleistocene Broken Hill 1 cranium". doi:10.17863/CAM.16919. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  23. Rightmire, Philip G. (1 July 1996). "The human cranium from Bodo, Ethiopia: evidence for speciation in the Middle Pleistocene?". Journal of Human Evolution. 31 (1): 21–39. doi:10.1006/jhev.1996.0046. ISSN 0047-2484.
  24. Drennan, Matthew R. (1955). "The special features and status of the Saldanha skull". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. Wiley. 13 (4): 625–634. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330130406. ISSN 0002-9483. PMID 13292529.
  25. Lacruz, Rodrigo S.; Stringer, Chris B.; Kimbel, William H.; Wood, Bernard; Harvati, Katerina; O’Higgins, Paul; Bromage, Timothy G.; Arsuaga, Juan-Luis (15 April 2019). "The evolutionary history of the human face" (PDF). Nature Ecology & Evolution. Springer Science+Business Media. 3 (5): 726–736. doi:10.1038/s41559-019-0865-7. ISSN 2397-334X. PMID 30988489. S2CID 115161686.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.