Seattle Construction and Drydock Company
The Seattle Construction and Drydock Company was a shipbuilding company based in Seattle, Washington. Between 1911 and 1918, it produced a substantial number of ships for both commercial and military uses. In the beginning of the 20th century, until its significance was diluted by the emergence of a number of shipyards during the World War I shipbuilding boom, it was the largest of its kind in Seattle and one of the few significant ship yards along the West Coast of the United States.
.jpeg.webp)
History
Formally established in 1911, the shipyard could trace its history back to 1882, when Robert Moran opened a marine repair shop at Yesler's Wharf (47.60110°N 122.337660°W) and became involved with Bailey Gatzert and the Seattle Dry Dock & Ship Building Company. Moran was elected mayor of Seattle in 1888 and while his original shop and the dry dock became a victim of the Great Seattle Fire of 1889, the business continued to expand and became the Moran Brothers Shipyard, located a few steps further south (47.594979°N 122.337502°W[1]). On February 27, 1906 the Moran family left the business, the yard was sold for $2,000,000 to Bertron, Storrs and Griscom of New York, who also gained the right to the company name and the yard now operated as The Moran Company[2] and became the Seattle Construction and Drydock Company at the end of 1911.
Some time in 1916, William H. Todd made one of the first acquisitions for the corporation that would become a national enterprise later on by buying Seattle Construction and Drydock. Todd's business at that time consisted of facilities in New York harbor along the waterfront of Red Hook, Brooklyn and in Weehawken Cove, Hoboken. Soon after, Skinner & Eddy became a major shipbuilder in Seattle, their facilities built from the ground up starting in February of 1916 directly adjacent to the Seattle Construction yard.[3] In 1918 Todd moved to the north end of Harbor Island to open a repair dock and Skinner & Eddy took control of both yards on the waterfront. The transfer took place on 11 May 1918, the price was $4,000,000. Skinner & Eddy were to pay the Emergency Fleet Corporation for the yard at a rate of $125,000 per completed ship.[4] The Seattle Construction and Dry Dock Company was henceforth called Skinner & Eddy Plant No. 2.
Skinner & Eddy invested approx. $1,000,000 to modernize the plant, but defaulted on their payments after having paid $514,441.40 and the EFC repossessed the yard on 22 March 1920. On 21 January 1924 shipways and removable equipment were sold to the Schnitzer and Wolf Machinery Co, of Portland, Oregon[lower-alpha 1] for $226,255 and remaining "Balance of property owned" for $600,000 to the Port of Seattle on 31 December 1923. Three buildings remained "to be disposed of".[5] In the 1930s, the area between Dearborn and Connecticut Street was Seattle's largest[6] Hooverville.[7]
Todd's facilities on Harbor Island would then be expanded in the winter of 1940 / 1941 and become the "Seattle" in Seattle-Tacoma Shipbuilding Corporation.
Of the 6 steel shipyards active during that time in Puget Sound, Seattle Construction was the only one that had existed prior to the outbreak of World War I. J. F. Duthie & Company had built small boats before, but underwent a major expansion of its facilities in 1916.
The construction of USS Omaha (CL-4) was contracted for on 26 December 1916 and for Milwaukee and Cincinnati on 27 August 1917. All three of the ships were laid down after long delays by the Todd yard in Tacoma.[8]
| Yard# | Owner | Name | Type | Contracted | Launched[lower-alpha 2] | Delivered |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ships built by Moran Brothers (selection) | ||||||
| 1 | Navy | Rowan | ||||
| 36 | King County | King County | ||||
| 41 | Navy | Nebraska | battleship | 7 Mar 01[9] | 7 Oct 04 | 31 May 07 |
| Ships built by The Moran Company (selection) | ||||||
| 55 | Navy | F-3 | submarine | 5 Mar 09[10] | 6 Jan 12 | 5 Aug 12 |
| 56 | F-4 | submarine | ||||
| 57 | Puget Sound Navigation Company | Kulshan | ||||
| 58 | Sioux | |||||
| 59 | Navy | H-3 | submarine | 10 Aug 10[11] | 3 Jul 13 | 16 Jan 14 |
| 62 | K-4 | submarine | 31 May 11[12] | 19 Mar 14 | 26 Oct 14 | |
| Ships built by the Seattle Construction and Dry Dock Company (selection) | ||||||
| 68 | Puget Sound Navigation Company | Sol Duc | ||||
| 69 | Chile / Canada | Iquique | submarine | |||
| 70 | Antofogasta | |||||
| 71 | Puget Sound Navigation Company | Potlatch | ||||
| 73 | Tacoma | |||||
| 74 | Comanche | |||||
| 78 | Navy | Bushnell (AS-2) | submarine tender | 30 Jun 13[13][14][15][16] | 9 Feb 15 | |
| 79 | Arapaho (AT-14) | oceangoing tug | 20 Jun 14 | |||
| 80 | Mohave (AT-15) | 20 Jul 14 or 20 Jun 14 | ||||
| 81 | Tillamook (AT-16) | 15 Aug 14 | ||||
| Seattle Constr. activities as part of the Todd Corporation (complete) | ||||||
| 82 | Navy | N-1 | submarine | 19 Mar 15 [lower-alpha 3][17] | 30 Dec 16 | 26 Sep 17 |
| 83 | N-2 | 16 Jan 17 | 26 Sep 17 | |||
| 84 | N-3 | 21 Feb 17 | 26 Sep 17 | |||
| 85 | New York & Cuba Mail Line[18][19][lower-alpha 4] | Cauto | cargo | 23 Sep 16 | 9 Dec 16 | |
| 86 | Panuco | cargo | 21 Oct 16 | 9 Jan 17 | ||
| 87 | Navy | Gwin | destroyer | 8 Mar 16[20] | 20 Dec 17 | 18 Mar 20 |
| 88 | Knut Knutsen, Norway | Golden Gate | cargo | 14 Mar 17 | 10 May 17 | |
| 89 | Key West | 11 Apr 17 | 16 Jun 17 | |||
| 90 | Haakon Wallen Co., Norway | Storviken | 6 Jun 17 | 23 Jul 17 | ||
| 91 | Edgar F. Luckenbach / Req.[lower-alpha 5] | Walter A. Luckenbach | 10,500dwt cargo[21] | 9 Feb 16[22] | 15 Dec 17 | 31 May 18 |
| 92 | Norwegian / Req.[lower-alpha 5] | Hull No. 92 | 7,500dwt cargo[21] | 3 Apr 16[22] | 21 Nov 17 | 28 Jan 18 |
| 93 | Willy Gilbert / Req.[lower-alpha 5] | Southerland | 11 Aug 16[22] | 19 Jan 18 | 16 May 18 | |
| 94 | Bremerton | 27 Mar 18 | 24 Apr 18 | |||
| 95 | Vittorio Emanuelle III | 24 May 18 | 27 Jun 18 | |||
| 96 | Barber SS Co. / Req[lower-alpha 5] | 2 Oct 16[22] | Transferred to and laid down in Tacoma | |||
| 97-99, 101-103 | Cunard Line / Req.[lower-alpha 5] | 14 Feb 17[22] | ||||
| 100 | Navy | Omaha | cruiser | 26 Dec 16 | ||
| 106 | Milwaukee | 27 Aug 17 | ||||
| 107 | Cincinnati | |||||
| 108 | USSB Contract No. 13[lower-alpha 6] | Willmantic | 7,500dwt cargo | 6 Jun 17 | 29 May 18 | Nov 18 |
| 109 | Deranof | 20 Jun 18 | Dec 19 | |||
| 110 | Delight | 4 Jul 18[lower-alpha 7] | Sep 19 | |||
| 111 | Gaffney[lower-alpha 8] | 25 Jul 18 | Dec 19 | |||
- Probably Schnitzer Steel
- See List of ship launches in 1914 through 1918 for references
- Contractor was the Electric Boat Company, New York. Date of subcontract unknown.
- For some time these ships were in the hands of the USSB, but they were not "commandeered existing construction"
- Requsitioned by USSB
- At least four ships of this contract were built by Seattle Construction,[23] the rest were laid down in the just completed Todd Tacoma yard, although they are also attributed to the Seattle Construction and Drydock Company in various sources. USSB hull numbers are oddly confusing wrt. yard numbers. Willimantic USSB #107 through Gaffney USSB #110
- One of 95 ships launched nationwide on that day
- attributed to both Seattle Constr. and (errorneously to) Skinner & Eddy, who did not buy the contract together with the yard
Clarence Bagley, in his History of Seattle from the earliest settlement to the present time, Volume 2, wrote:
The plant of the Moran company, together with that of the Seattle Dry Dock & Ship Building Company, which had been organized in 1887 and was under the control of the Morans, was at this time the most complete on the Pacific Coast, outside of San Francisco. It had grown to such immense proportions that even while the construction of its masterpiece, the (USS) Nebraska, was underway, other work was being handled in the same efficient manner as before the big contract had been secured. Some of the notable work turned out during the period was the building of the steel tugs Bahada and Wyadda, the lighthouse tender Heather and the rebuilding of the steamships Cutch and Willamette.[24]
- . . .
When the Nebraska was finished and given her official trial trip in the waters of the Straits of Fuca, Captain Perkins, senior member of the trial board, pronounced her one of the best vessels in the United States navy. Notwithstanding bad weather, the ship fully met the requirements of the Government and proved that Seattle had a construction company capable of building the largest kind of ship. In March, 1906, the Moran Brothers Company was sold to Eastern capitalists, who reorganized the business under the name of The Moran Company, which, in 1912, became the Seattle Construction & Dry Dock Company. During the year 1911 the company began building the first of six submarine boats for the United States navy. About the same time five steel whalers were built for companies operating in the northern whaling waters, and in 1913 the $500,000 dry dock was completed. This dry dock was 468 feet long and 110 feet wide and the steamship Admiral Farragut was the first vessel to enter it for repairs.[24]
The company produced over 90 ships, including a substantial number of battleships and submarines for the United States Navy, submarines for the Royal Canadian Navy, as well as commercial oceangoing vessels. By 1917, the plant covered about 27 acres (110,000 m2) and employed about 1,500 men. In that year, it had six building slips up to 600 feet (180 m) long; two drydocks of 12,000 tons capacity each, one drydock of 3,000 tons capacity, and was equipped to take care of repairs of all kinds.[25] The company formally ceased operations in 1918, due in large part to the poaching of its skilled laborers by newly established competitors.[26] It ultimately was acquired by William H. Todd, who operated the company as a subsidiary of the Todd Pacific Shipyards Corporation, which had been founded in 1916 as the William H. Todd Corporation.[27] It became the "Seattle" in Seattle-Tacoma Shipbuilding Corporation and operated under that name during World War II as one of the biggest suppliers of escort carriers and destroyers for the United States Navy. Other companies operated by Todd included the Robins Dry Dock & Repair Company of Erie Basin, Brooklyn, New York, the Tietjen & Long Dry Dock Company of Hoboken, New Jersey.[27]
Notes
References
- Baist's Real Estate Surveys of Seattle, Plate 23, accessed July 14, 2022.
- Cases Decided in the Court of Claims of the United States. Vol. 61. 1926. p. 93.
- https://content.libraries.wsu.edu/iiif/2/maps:84/0,0,20000,20000/6000,/0/default.png
- Hearings Before Select Committee on U.S. Shipping Board Operations, Part 1. 1920. pp. 145–146.
- House. Select Committee of Inquiry into Operations, Policies, and Affairs of the United States Shipping Board and Emergency Fleet Corporation (1925). Exhibits 214 to 254. U.S. Government Printing Office.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - https://depts.washington.edu/depress/hooverville_map.shtml
- https://www.realchangenews.org/news/2009/06/24/story-hooverville-seattle
- Ship's data US Navy Vessels. 1919.
- Ship's Data U.S. Navy Vessels. 1919. p. 26.
- Ship's Data U.S. Navy Vessels. 1919. p. 153.
- Ship's Data U.S. Navy Vessels. 1919. p. 155.
- Ship's Data U.S. Navy Vessels. 1919. p. 155.
- Ship's data US Navy Vessels. 1919.
- Ship's data US Navy Vessels. 1919.
- Ship's data US Navy Vessels. 1919.
- Ship's data US Navy Vessels. 1919.
- Ship's data US Navy Vessels. 1919.
- "Shipping Notes". Pacific Marine Review. January 1917. p. 80.
- "West Coast Shipping Matters". Pacific Marine Review. February 1917. p. 80.
- Ship's data US Navy Vessels. 1919.
- United States-Norway Arbitration. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1922. p. 412.
- United States-Norway Arbitration. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1922. p. 408-409.
- Hearings Before Select Committee on U.S. Shipping Board Operations, Part 1. 1920. p. 233.
- Clarence Bagley, History of Seattle from the earliest settlement to the present time, Volume 2 (1916), p. 609.
- Welford Beaton, Frank Waterhouse & Company's Pacific ports (1917). p. 273.
- Walter V. Woehlke, Union Labor in Peace and War (1918), p. 107.
- "William H. Todd", The Rudder (1919), Vol. XXXV, p. 61.